The Taciturn Demon

Oh this is interesting. Seemed like Culley was odds on until Henderson got home like Kingston Town. Do they see Culley as completely different - taller, more of a pure midfielder, not an ANB replacement - or do they class Henderson as a midfielder and lean towards a different kind of player entirely?

Depends on whether you rupture it completely or just strain it. Three weeks all the way up to half a season.

Hope this is true. Problem might be that he's done the unhappy triad, which is where you pop the ACL, the MCL and the meniscus. The ACL is often agonising pain that subsides reasonably quickly and then becomes a dull ache inside the knee - it's hard to point to. The MCL is also painful, but lingers and is easy to identify (if a physio asks you).

D tier sport, as the kids would say.

This is almost as bad as Champion Data ratings.

This is going to sound negative. I don't mean it to be. I saw the video of Taylor and Lamb talking about Henderson with Goodwin and others and their comments were glowing. Now, I know a club isn't going to release footage of football department members bagging newly recruited players, but I'm still intrigued: What's the knock on him? Why isn't a player considered to have outstanding ball-handling skills, an ability to kick goals (from long-range as well as close to goal) and excellent movement and fitness not already on a list?

This is such a good post.

"Do my time" is such a post-free agency concept. The draft is at best a nuisance - at worst a form of fairytale authoritarianism. You must bow to the king, feigning loyalty, but after six years the spell is broken and then you are free and can kiss rebel princes and sing with forest animals in your home state to your heart's content.

The most unlikeable club in the league.

Yep. My memory is that the West Coast lost felt as if it came completely out of the blue. In hindsight it was probably the moment most of us began to realise Oliver was a shadow of his former self - the good early games were an aberration. For me I think it was also the time when I went from having nagging doubts about the big-name midfield to realising whatever it's doing, and however it's coached, it longer works consistently.

This is it. It's not just that we finished fifth last, which is bad. It's how wildly unpredictable we became. A fantastic win against Geelong, followed by a now-familiar Carlton loss, followed by being pantsed by a West Coast side that won just 4 other games (and ended up with a percentage in the 60s), then cruising past St Kilda, then putting in easily one of the worst performances I've ever seen from a Melbourne team (pound for pound) against Fremantle, then completely failing to "bounce back" against Collingwood, then returning from a bye to barely scrape home against North... ...all over the shop. And if the answer is "injuries", a pretty reasonable response would be "where was the depth to at least stem the bleeding"? We lost to Fremantle by 15 goals and I think most observers thought it could have been a LOT more. That was with Gawn, May, Viney, Petracca, Oliver, Pickett, Rivers and Fritsch. Why would you predict us to have a good season... unless you desperately wanted it? Because our best players will play unhindered? We all hope so. Is that enough a full three years after a flag? The '21 Premiership was unexpected because we'd had so little finals experience, but not from an age profile. Because our kids are particularly good? Fans of every club are excited about their under 23s - it's what fans do... and rightly so. (I'm genuinely delighted that the draft fell in such a way that we got Harvey Langford.) But this can become myopic. Is the evidence strong that our kids are WAY better than everyone else's? It's possible. Not sure if it's probable. Because the game plan will change? It HAS to, but it can take a long time to iron out wrinkles in a new way of playing. To be honest, I don't really care what supposed experts think our chances are. But I'm not shocked that very few think we'll make the eight. PS: On a completely unrelated note I was absolutely certain the player in the OP's profile pic was Andrew Obst until I saw the incongruous Zurich sponsor logo.

But isn't this almost as unusual as player-for-player exchanges?

It's atrocious. Can someone explain why people talk about "restraint of trade" relating to individuals (and so making free agency essential) but not clubs?

They had to sneak it in before they murdered Fitzroy.

My disdain for Fremantle is near Carlton levels.